Hi Douglas,

As Scott mentioned, we depend on the JAXB runtime to marshal/demarshal the
data types. I have also noticed this one while using the
org.apache.axiom.om.OMElement as the data type with binding.ws as shown
below.

SEVERE: org.apache.tuscany.sca.databinding.TransformationException:
org.apache.tuscany.sca.databinding.TransformationException:
com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.IllegalAnnotationsException: 6 counts of
IllegalAnnotationExceptions
org.apache.axiom.om.OMElement is an interface, and JAXB can't handle
interfaces.
    this problem is related to the following location:
        at org.apache.axiom.om.OMElement
        at protected org.apache.axiom.om.OMElement
org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.axis2.itests.mtom.jaxws.UploadOMElementFile.arg0
        at
org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.axis2.itests.mtom.jaxws.UploadOMElementFile

This issue is raised as TUSCANY-2664. Please add your issue as part of this
JIRA OR you can also raise a seperate one.

I am currently looking if we can have some workaround for this issue as this
feature is very much required to support MTOM with binding.ws.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Scott Kurz <[email protected]> wrote:

> Douglas,
>
> Since our <binding.ws> impl uses JAXB by default to map from the XML
> wireformat to the application Java, the JAXB runtime needs to be able to
> deserialize into your input/output types.   If the types don't contain JAXB
> annotations, they need to follow the pattern that JAXB expects, i.e. they
> must contain the no-arg default constructor.
>
> Also I'll mention that we follow the JAX-WS spec in order to map between a
> Java exception and the platform-neutral fault data it carries.   (See
> "Business Exceptions/Faults" at
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Databinding+Scope
> for more info.
>
> It crossed my mind that maybe your interface is passing java.lang.Exception
> as an input parameter because you weren't aware of  how to "throw" it across
> <binding.ws> .... or maybe you have a good reason for doing so and it was
> just a useful example.
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Douglas Leite <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> When I try to use the binding.ws over an interface that has an operation
>> that takes a complex type with no-arg default constructor, in some part of
>> the hierarchy, as argument,  I get an error.
>>
>> More specifically I have something like this:
>> *
>> @Remotable
>> public interface MyService {
>>
>>     @OneWay
>>     public void throwsAnException(Exception ex);
>> }*
>>
>> At the SCDL file:
>>
>> *<composite    xmlns="http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0";
>>         targetNamespace="http://myservice";
>>         name="myservice">
>>
>> **<component name="MyServiceComponent">
>> *
>> *
>> **<implementation.java class="service.MyServiceImpl"/>
>> *
>> *
>> **                  <service name="MyService">
>> *
>> *                           <interface.java
>> interface="service.MyService"/>
>> *
>> *                                    <binding.ws uri="
>> http://localhost:8086/MyServiceComponent"; />
>> *
>> *                 </service>
>> *
>> *</component>
>> *
>> *</composite>*
>>
>> I got the following error:
>>
>> SEVERE: Exception thrown was: org.osoa.sca.ServiceRuntimeException:
>> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.IllegalAnnotationsException: 1 counts of
>> IllegalAnnotationExceptions
>> java.lang.StackTraceElement does not have a no-arg default constructor.
>>         this problem is related to the following location:
>>                 at java.lang.StackTraceElement
>>                 at public java.lang.StackTraceElement[]
>> java.lang.Throwable.getStackTrace()
>>                 at java.lang.Throwable
>>                 at java.lang.Exception
>>
>> Although the Exception an Throwable classes have no-arg default
>> constructors, the StackTraceElement doesn't have.
>> What can I do to avoid this problem?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> --
>> Douglas Siqueira Leite
>> Computer Science Master's degree student of University of Campinas
>> (Unicamp), Brazil
>>
>>
>


-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam

Reply via email to