On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote:
> Please review and vote on the 2.0-M1 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for > Java. > > The artifacts are available for review at: > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/2.0-M1-RC2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende/tuscany/2.0-M1-RC2/> > > This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, > and the Maven staging repository. > > The release tag is available at : > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1-RC2/ > > > Looks OK to me, here is my +1. > > This is looking pretty close, one more RC and i think it will be perfect :-) - Didn't fix Rams RC1 comment about missing the RELEASE_NOTES and CHANGES file in the tag - The maven staging repository is missing the maven plugins - I don't think the DWR binding needed to be excluded from the sc distro. Doesn't really matter either way but there is no harm in keeping it in and that way we avoid all the issues we've had in the past with the builds using complicated includes/excludes which end up going wrong - Something went wrong with the RAT report again and it would be good to have RAT reports for for both bin and src distro's. I ran some myself and found a cuople of issues: - sca-contribution.xsd in the eclipse plugin core module has an AL header instead of OASIS - There's a Constants class in the SCA-API module with an AL header, should this have a OASIS header or should the Constants class not be used? Need to check the specs but If the class isn't defined in a spec i think the class should be removed from the sca-api module. ...ant
