Looks good to me, +1

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:35 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:33 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:52 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on releasing the Tuscany Maven Eclipse Compiler module. The
>>>> tag for the release is:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/maven-plugins/tags/maven-eclipse-compiler-1.0/
>>>>
>>>> the Maven staging repository is:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/maven-eclipse-compiler-1.0/
>>>>
>>>>    ...ant
>>>>
>>>
>>> Adding my vote to remind people this is pending still.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Also, in case the location of the tag is bothering anyone we can put the
>>> tag anywhere we like and can rename and move the tag after the release vote
>>> as we do with the SCA releases, eg i've just copied it to
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/maven-eclipse-compiler-1.0/
>>>
>>>    ...ant
>>>
>>>
>> Just ran a build from the staging repo. Didn't get a clean build but I
>> don't think that's this plugin's fault.
>>
>> B.t.w. For anyone wishing to actually test this you'll need to change the
>> dependency in sca/pom.xml around line 461...
>>
>>                     <dependencies>
>>                         <dependency>
>>
>> <groupId>org.apache.tuscany.maven.plugins</groupId>
>>
>> <artifactId>maven-eclipse-compiler</artifactId>
>>                             <version>1.0</version>
>>                             <scope>provided</scope>
>>                         </dependency>
>>                     </dependencies>
>>
>> The LICENSE/NOTICES are at the top level and signatures verify.
>>
>> I do notice that  the artifact name is a little inconsistent re. how these
>> things usually appear, e.g. it should really be
>> <artifactId>maven-eclipse-compiler-plugin</artifactId>? However it's not
>> bothered me before otherwise I would have raised if on the original thread.
>> Not bothering me enought to -1 this vote unless someone finds another reason
>> to respin.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Simon
>>
>
> Thanks for voting!  Re the artifactid, i think thats as this isn't actually
> a maven "plugin" module its a compiler. Our other modules that are proper
> maven plugins do end in plugin, eg tools\maven\maven-bundle-plugin.
>
>    ...ant
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to