On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:45 AM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Raymond Feng <enjoyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think it's the security policy file to test SCA code with Java2 security
>> enabled. It probably should stay under "sca".
>> From: ant elder
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 9:32 AM
>> To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
>> Subject: Could tuscany/java/sca/etc/policy-continuum.policy move to
>> tuscany/java/etc ?
>> This came up on the 2.0 M1 release reviews, I'm not sure how the file is
>> used, can it be moved out of the sca build to
>> tuscany/java/etc/policy-continuum.policy? I guess that requires some update
>> required to the continuum build config?
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>>
>
> AFAICT its a general purpose policy for continuum, there's nothing about SCA
> in the file:
>
> grant codeBase "file:/home/continuum/data/working-directory/277/-" {
> permission java.security.AllPermission;
> };
>
> grant codeBase "file:~/.m2/-" {
> permission java.security.AllPermission;
> };
>
> so it could be used for any of the Tuscany project builds in continuum.
> There's no harm in having in the top etc folder is there? And that would
> also get it out of the SCA src distribution as was mention in the M1 release
> reviews.
>
The continuum builds are only checking out the project specific folder
(e.g for SCA --> java/sca). If we move this out, then it's not going
to be visible for the SCA build, that is currently the only project
using java security. But I'm flexible as long as you find a workaround
for the build issue.
> ...ant
>
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
