On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:54 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Its a merge of sca-equinox and 1x. Is there something thats missing that > you > > can't merge in? > > > > ...ant > > I guess this is the issue, tracking what is there or not... > I'd recommend starting from either contrib or 1.x code. > A lot of the sca-contrib code was never properly brought up and its getting quite stale now so it may not always be the best place to start. I don't think there will be a best approach to this as it depends on the module, and thats fine, its the 1.x code that has been active so i think the important thing is after something is brought up in 2.x that a diff is done against the equivalent 1.x code and the differences analyzed to see if there are any regressions, thats what i've been doing with all the extensions i've been bringing up and i don't see any issues with these bpel modules. ...ant
