On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > Interesting. Is there a particular reason why old release candidates are > > maintained in svn? Why not delete the RC's? E.g. 2.0-M1-RC1, RC2, and RC3? I > > find them confusing, when searching for a tag... > > I don't have any particular reason, I guess I'm just following some > pattern done in the past.
fyi, I've just deleted most of the old RC tags for the SCA releases. ...ant
