On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, thanks for the clarification. > > I meant 1.x if it's not so disruptive. Of course, we need to do that for 2.x > too. > > Thanks,
snip... I wasn't implying that I think it's particularly disruptive. Was just checking;-) Simon
