On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Scott Kurz <[email protected]> wrote: > Simon, that all sounds good to me. > > It was only recently that I'd even run across the need to maybe look > at isWrapperStyle(), from say, a binding impl, in the case of > implementing the wireFormat.jmsdefault behavior of sending a single > argument unwrapped. The new API should work well with that use case. > Not sure if others have concerns I'm not considering though... > > I'd think some of the code (like the Java2WSDL maybe) you're going to > have to modify makes an assumption that input & output are either both > wrapped or both unwrapped... (since JAX-WS defines "isWrapped" at the > operation level) so an idea would be to possibly add a validation > exception there.
Good point. > > Scott >
