On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:48 AM, ant elder (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12689864#action_12689864 > ] > > ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2906: > ------------------------------------ > > and TUSCANY-2948 > >> WSDL/XSD imports should use location/schemaLocation as hints and not fail >> due to locations that don't map to actual locations >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: TUSCANY-2906 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2906 >> Project: Tuscany >> Issue Type: Bug >> Components: Java SCA Data Binding Runtime >> Reporter: Scott Kurz >> Assignee: Ramkumar Ramalingam >> Priority: Minor >> Attachments: 2906.recreate.jar, TUSCANY-2906-Part1.patch, >> TUSCANY-2906-Part2.patch >> >> >> My test app uses wsdl import and xsd import with @location and >> @schemaLocation, respectively, specifying values that don't actually >> correspond to relative locations within my contribution JAR. (The motive >> might be that in moving from my test env to my deploy env i've shuffled the >> relative paths around for some reason). >> When reading BasicProfile 1.1, section 4.2.4, I take that to mean that our >> runtime should be able to handle an "incorrect" @location (though 4.2.3 says >> it shouldn't be empty). Instead we blow up. >> In reading the XSD spec quickly I think the same should apply to >> @schemaLocation on XSD import, though I don't see that BP says anything >> about this. I did test to confirm that if @schemaLocation is simply left >> blank then we have no problem finding the XSD within the contribution... >> it's just a problem if it's set to a value that doesn't correspond to >> anything in the JAR. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > >
Hi Ant And the reason why you are seeing so many more problems that I am is that I haven't taken the 2906 changes yet. I'm going to get to a stage where I have a clean build locally before upgrading as there are other problems that are being masked by the schema location related problems. Am looking at the NPE in the store tutorial now. Simon
