On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Wojtek Janiszewski <[email protected]> wrote: > And my doubts: > For each Erlang node (which in fact is for every service binding) I'm > creating connection listener, and after establishing connection new request > is going to be handled by separate thread taken from pool. I'm not feeling > that having fixed size of thread pool is good idea, it should be > configurable to match users requirements. I'm not sure if such option fits > as <binding.erlang> attribute, if not then where such value should be > passed? >
Are there case where each different services would have different configuration parameters for these values ? If so, attributes to <binding.earlang> seems like a good start. > I'd also like to move this code out of the sandbox. Which branch should I > choose? Is the erlang binding based on 1.x (1.x branch) or 2.x (trunk) code ? This might help answer your question... > > Thanks, > Wojtek > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
