On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 from me. >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "ant elder" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:44 AM >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 M2 RC2 >> >>> Please review and vote on RC2 of the SCA 2.0-M2 release. >>> >>> The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository >>> are available for review at: >>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-M2-RC2/ >>> >>> The release tag is available at : >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M2/ >>> >>> +1 from me. >>> >>> ...ant >> > > -1 from me. > > There are a few license funnies... > > assembly-xsd > now has OASIS xsd but doesn't include OASIS details in LICENSE or NOTICE > file > > Top level LICENSE > doesn't include OASIS details > doesn't include > geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar > geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1.jar > geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1.jar > regexp-1.3.jar > > Top level NOTICE > doesn't include OASIS details > > implementation-web-runtime > now has sca.tld but doesn't include OSOA details in LICENSE/NOTICE > > host-webapp > no longer has sca.tld but does include OSOA details in LICENSE/NOTICE > > I can go ahead and fix the easy things but where are we with the OASIS > LICENSE question? >
Sure go ahead, let me know when you're done and I'll respin. AFAICT we're fine to use the OASIS license. The Wicket module isn't finished yet, the webapp samples do work but I was going to change them to be the same as what the archetypes create but thats not done yet. ...ant
