On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:02 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "ant elder" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 9:16 AM >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Folder and ZIP format contributions containing nested >> application JARs >> >> [[snip]] >>> >>> I'm not sure if you're objecting to supporting zip contributions with >>> nested jars or that currently the change to do that doesn't >>> discriminated between zip and jar contributions so its possible to >>> nest jars in jars? >> >> I'm against adding nested jars to jar contributions. Zip contributions can >> have its own classloading scheme. >> > > Cool, me too. Like i said earlier this is work in progress and thats > just a whole that needs to be plugged, i'll go prevent that from being > possible. > > ...ant >
Sorry, I overlooked this thread as I was out at the time. In summary then are you saying your preference is the following.... OK ----- mycontrib.ear myutil.jar mycontrib/ myutil.jar Not OK ----------- mycontrib.jar myutil.jar Simon
