On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:51 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > TUSCANY-2167 was caused by the base policy modules including WS binding > > policy and dragging in some WS dependencies wasn't it? So thats fixed now > > and isn't any issue with merging binding-ws-axis2-policy in the > > binding-ws-axis2 module is it? > > > > You might be right, and you are probably more familiar with the JMS > and WS bindings to make the decision.... just consider the issues we > have been discussing on other threads... if it applies here... > > Which issues specifically apply here? I'm not being pedantic just trying to avoid having changes blocked out of fear of change. The 2.x codestream is our opportunity to make things better, sure there are good reasons for the way some things are but there are also no good reasons for the way some other things are. ...ant
