On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Scott Kurz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ram, > > Thanks for the updated summary. > > I have a couple of questions, if you don't mind. > > First, this is probably an obvious question, but by the "SCA > resolution mechanism" you mean: > 1. first look in the current contribution > and if not found > 2. then look for SCA contribution import/exports. Yes you are right, this is the approach we are currently using by saying as "SCA resolution mechnanism". > > Second, the behavior you described makes sense to me, but we do agree > it is not what the Assembly spec says, right? I am not trying to > push on spec compliance at the moment, just getting clear since we'd > been discussing the spec statement in the past. > > Thanks, Scott > Yeah, we might be slightly deviating from what specs says in this case. I believe we are still compliant with specs in terms of resolving XSD imports with @schemaLocation. But the case is little different in case of resoling WSDL imports. We might need to take this up with the specs teams to reconsider for this case. -- Thanks & Regards, Ramkumar Ramalingam
