ant elder (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12703008#action_12703008 ]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2989:
------------------------------------
See http://apache.markmail.org/message/jcscho3frvslpm44. Would be good to have
the ASM_8001 testcase part of the build.
Ant,
Sure - and Kelvin is working on pulling the OASIS conformance tests into the regular build - but
Tuscany fails about 30% of them currently :-( - mainly due to not treating errors seriously enough -
continues and runs SCA composites containing significant errors that the specs say should not run.
Regarding your other email. If a composite is handed to the Node "by value" and is not part of any
contribution, then what is it supposed to be resolved against? Where are all its "bits" supposed to
come from? I can see one possible solution is to treat it as if it is part of one of the
contributions - say the first in the list. If that isn't done, how does the runtime know where to
look for its implementations, etc?
Yours, Mike.
