[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12703130#action_12703130
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2967:
------------------------------------
Extending <binding.jms> to allow configuration of a fault destination with its
own wireformat seems like a good approach to me.
and i agree with the comment about in that case it might not be worth trying to
make the current state of affairs any better. We've made changes to the jms
exception handling in several past Tuscany releases, might be nicer for our
users to stop changing things till we really know what we want
> For binding.jms, consider a more natural exception handling strategy for
> non-XML, non-Object wireFormats
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-2967
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2967
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java SCA JMS Binding Extension
> Reporter: Scott Kurz
> Assignee: ant elder
>
> For the wF.jmsBytes, wF.jmsText cases, (when we're not dealing w/ JAX-WS
> exceptions/faults mapping to XML), it seems odd that we would give you back a
> TextMessage/BytesMessage for a normal response but an ObjectMessage for an
> exception (granted this was partly my idea).
> Should we instead do something like a toString() and convert an exception to
> a String we could place in either a BytesMessage or TextMessage? True, I
> think fidelity would suffer here and the app on the other end might not be
> able to reconstitute an exception instance matching the one thrown by the SCA
> service impl before it was turned into a toString by the SCA binding.jms.
> But I wonder if this is too unexpected.... if I'm expecting to receive a
> response TextMessage and get a ClassCastException because I get an
> ObjectMessage, that might seem really strange.
> Maybe this needs more discussion. I also admit I have no idea what other
> frameworks involving a map between RPC-ish invocations and JMS apps do with
> exceptions.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
