Thanks Luciano, for information and the patch. Currently I am working on refactoring spring modules in 2.x. I should be able to work on this on starting from next week.
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Ramkumar R <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> This would be ok for now, but the proper fix would be to have pojo > >> related interfaces available in a separated module that could be > >> exported via OSGi and used by all pojo related extensions (e.g java, > >> ejb, spring). I have started doing that in implementation.pojo, but > >> that still need some more work, and then migrate the related > >> extensions to use it. > > > > Hi Luciano, > > > > That seems to be a good idea, as you said that would also benefit the jee > > modules which also needs the java introspecting techniques. > > > > If you wish, I can go ahead and create a seperate module as you have > > suggested. > > As I am currently working in 2.x, there should not be any issue in taking > > this up. > > > > I finally found the work I have initiated for implementation-pojo at > [1]. I'd probably recommend renaming the module to something like > core-pojo to avoid confusion with implementation-pojo sample that we > have in 1.x. Note that the current changes I had to the pojo based > extensions to use implementation-pojo is available as a patch in > TUSCANY-2988 and you might need to review and complete it before > applying these changes to avoid any breakage. > > [1] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/sca-contrib/modules/implementation-pojo/ > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2988 > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > -- Thanks & Regards, Ramkumar Ramalingam
