On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 3:04 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: lresende > Date: Sat May 2 02:04:03 2009 > New Revision: 770880 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=770880&view=rev > Log: > TUSCANY-2968 - Renaming new binding.http module to avoid confusion with the > oasis draft, as we are not really implementing the whole spec but just > following the wireFormat and operationSelector options implemented in > binding.jms > > Added: > tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/modules/binding-http-new/ > - copied from r770878, > tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/modules/binding-http-oasis/ > tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/modules/binding-http-new-jsonrpc/ > - copied from r770878, > tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/modules/binding-http-oasis-jsonrpc/ > tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/modules/binding-http-new-jsonrpc-runtime/ > - copied from r770878, > tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/modules/binding-http-oasis-jsonrpc-runtime/ > tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/modules/binding-http-new-runtime/ > - copied from r770878, > tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/modules/binding-http-oasis-runtime/ > Removed: > tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/modules/binding-http-oasis/ > tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/modules/binding-http-oasis-jsonrpc/ > tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/modules/binding-http-oasis-jsonrpc-runtime/ > tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.x/modules/binding-http-oasis-runtime/ >
Would you say a little more about this - are we not going to be implementing the new OASIS spec now? And if not whats the value of having a tuscany specific binding-http/wireformat instead of the existing binding-jsonrpc? ...ant
