Hi Luciano it becomes somewhat difficult to > plug new wireFormat/operationSelector types, as the binding > implementation need to somewhat know ahead of time which interceptor > to add. Also, checking the current implementation for Binding.JMS, > this seems to not be a problem, as all the possible > wireFormat/operationSelector types are all defined/implemented inside > the JMS Binding modules.
The binding should know that it is going to have wire format interceptors and operation selector interceptors but it shouldn't care what particular types are in use. The binding wire configuration is delegated to the binding itself (rather than being constructed completely generically) as there is value in being able to create very binding specific interceptors between which the wire format interceptor and operation selector interceptor slot. Hence the binding implementation is in charge of constructing the binding wire. Do you have some code checked in that shows the problem you are having? Simon
