On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Mike Edwards <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK, so this is getting towards the heart of the matter. > > Can we be clear about what "runtime dependencies" are the issue here. > > Do you have a clearly defined set of dependencies which are acceptable for > tooling use, and a set which are regarded as "runtime" and are unacceptable? > If we could establish this i think it will help immensely. And we could write a testcase using some contributions containing artifacts for all the extensions we have which reads/writes the models, verifies it looks ok, and then verifies the dependencies used are only the non-runtime ones. I'd be happy to volunteer to write such a testcase if we can come up with this list of dependencies ...ant
