I agree with Raymond, very good tool, very complete...good to keep track of Tuscany progress
+1 : ) On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. > > I personally tried the Hudson. It's very rich in reports. > > Thanks, > Raymond > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Luciano Resende" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 3:34 PM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Using Hudson zone for Tuscany Automated Builds > > > We have made various efforts to get our automated build build (see >> last one [1]) going in the Apache Continnum environment (vmbuild1), >> but it looks like we are always finding issues, etc, etc >> >> I'd like to start experimenting with the Apache Hudson environment >> [2], and have created a automated build for our 2.x code stream [3] >> which is building OK after I workarounded an issue described in >> TUSCANY-3015. >> >> If people are ok with this move, I'll start exploring this more and >> try to enabled : >> - snapshot deployments >> - build failure notifications >> >> Then, once we are glad with the results, I'll apply the same for the >> 1.x code stream... >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04923.html >> [2] http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/ >> [3] http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/ >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> >
