I was wondering if we should upgrade to 1.3.2 or to their 2.0 beta. Myabe we could use ODE 1.3.2 in 1.x and ODE 2.0 beta in our 2.x codestream ? Note that the ODE 2.0 beta would take a day or two at least, as there has been various SPI changes in the ODE 2.x codestream.
Thoughts ? On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Should we consider to upgrade our BPEL integration to the latest ODE > release? > > Thanks, > Raymond > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Alexis Midon" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:08 AM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ODE 1.3.2 released > >> The Apache ODE community is proud to announce its latest major >> release: Apache ODE 1.3.2 >> >> Apache ODE is a WS-BPEL compliant web services orchestration engine. >> It organizes web services calls following a process description >> written in the BPEL XML grammar. Another way to describe it would be a >> web-service capable workflow engine. >> >> This new release includes many features and improvements, among others: >> . XQuery 1.0 in BPEL queries and expressions >> . Publish/Subscribe across process instances >> . WS-BPEL processes provided over JMS >> . WS-Security support >> . Process data cleanup >> . better performance and memory management >> >> As well as many bug fixes. See the release notes for an exhaustive list: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE/fixforversion/12313906 >> >> For more information, check the Apache ODE website: >> http://ode.apache.org/getting-ode.html >> >> Apache ODE is an open source project released under a >> business-friendly license (Apache License v2.0), as such we welcome >> all your help and contributions. To participate and get involved, our >> mailing lists are the best resources to start from: >> http://ode.apache.org/mailing-lists.html >> >> The Apache ODE Team. > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
