On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:49 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:53 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The Axis2 1.5 release looks like it could start being voted on this week >>>> but that often can take some time and then the JMS transport would be >>>> released separately after that and then we'd need some time to polish a >>>> Tuscany release including those. So all that would likley take some weeks. >>>> There are alternatives like trying to port the new JMS transport to our >>>> existing ws binding, but thats likely a bit more work. >>>> >>> >>> If we're to get a 1.5 release out this month I'm starting to think we >>> should go with porting the new Axis2 JMS transport to work with the >>> existing Tuscany WS binding. >>> >>> Axis2 still haven't had their release and after that does happen there >>> would need to be a follow on release of the transports and all that >>> will have to take at lease a couple of weeks and then we'd need to >>> pick it up in Tuscany before doing the Tuscany 1.5 release...so all >>> that would likely push the Tuscany release in to June. >>> >>> So unless anyone can see any issues with the approach I'm going to >>> start looking at bringing the new Axis2 JMS transport into the Tuscany >>> WS binding. At least that will help us know how hard it is to do and >>> we can throw it all away if the Axis2 releases do start to happen more >>> quickly. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >> >> Sounds like the right thing to do given where we are. We also have >> this WSDL issue that Dave raised that I was going to look at. Is it >> safe to assume that we wait until these are done before retaking the >> branch? >> >> Simon >> > > I've fixed the soap/jms issue in TUSCANY-2916 now, whats the status of > the wsdl issue in TUSCANY-2900, is the work around in there enough for > us to start on the 1.5 release again now? > > ...ant >
I think it is. But maybe what we could do is run though the tests, legal etc in 1.x before cutting the branch to give a day or so more for responses. I intend to give the samples a runt through as soon as I can get done with some 2.x things I'm working on. Simon
