On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Scott Kurz <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Simon, > > So we already support the mirror image case today where we need a WSDL > intf for the binding but have only a Java intf in the component; we > generate a WSDL if necessary. > > So for the wf.jmsObject plus impl.bpel case, I suppose we could just > generate Java as well. > > So each binding requiring this could, in all cases, call a new SPI > named something like getJavaInterfaceContractForBinding() which would > first look at the app for a Java interface, and if one is not present, > we could generate one from the WSDL interface we would presumably > have. > > I purposely phrased that as "look at the app for a Java interface" > because I think we'd need to think through the details of which to > look at: component interface, componentType interface, or possibly > both. > > Scott >
Right Scott, and that's all together a bigger issue. I've checked in some changes for the first problem and closed of the JIRA. Lets address this second issue separately. It needs some thought and some examples. Simon
