Hi Lookman, I think you might have replied only to me, instead of to all, so I am cc'ing the dev list on this email.
I will wait for your patch to commit, and then test your code. It will probably take me a few days, but you'll get a reply from me about your patch. On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:28 PM, lookman sanni <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok cool oscar. I'll be providing a patch by the weekend for the final > version of the android UI to run the store. You may then test the whole > store, or as soon as luciano commits the patch i provided last monday, you > can test the services calls. Remember that the code is designed for android > 1.5 SDK. > I'll be travelling for some exams tomorrow and will get back by the end of > the weekend. I'm planning first to run for the sample calculator using the > two ways (extensions rewrited, retranslator), and regarding the results, > i'll choose a way to go. > > 2009/5/20 Oscar Castañeda <[email protected]> > > Actually, I would like to commit your code. I agreed to do so with Luciano. >> It will help me get up to speed as a committer and with some svn experiments >> I'm doing ;-) Any thoughts on this Luciano? >> >> Then, as suggested in the weekly update threads, please consider making >> steps for anything you want tested. It's good to have such things documented >> and will help me or anyone else with testing. >> >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:03 AM, lookman sanni <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Cool Oscar. >>> >>> Let's then wait Luciano's commit to the svn, and you can test my devs. >>> >>> 2009/5/14 Oscar Castañeda <[email protected]> >>> >>> If useful, I would be happy to help with testing when needed. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:11 PM, lookman sanni <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok then. I'll be completing the android store till the end of the week. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected] >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:56 AM, lookman sanni <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > Well, there's going to be then some kind of ids to identifiy users, >>>>>> but that >>>>>> > can't be unregardless the used clients. It won't be practical to >>>>>> start >>>>>> > asking for username/pwd or such things while the user isn't going to >>>>>> perform >>>>>> > any payment yet. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> If we want to provide a production ready sample, there is a need for >>>>>> several modifications such as allowing the user to provide the number >>>>>> of fruits he wants, handle multiple concurrently users, etc.... having >>>>>> said that, I think that, for our purpose, where we just want to >>>>>> showcase a Android application consuming sca services, what we have >>>>>> should be enough... >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Luciano Resende >>>>>> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende<http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> >>>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best Regards >>>>> >>>>> Lookman SANNI >>>>> http://blog.lookouster.org >>>>> MSBI Intern at Umanis Tours Services; >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> best, >>>> -oscar >>>> >>>> Oscar Castañeda >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ocastaneda<http://people.apache.org/%7Eocastaneda> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards >>> >>> Lookman SANNI >>> http://blog.lookouster.org >>> MSBI Intern at Umanis Tours Services; >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> best, >> -oscar >> >> Oscar Castañeda >> http://people.apache.org/~ocastaneda<http://people.apache.org/%7Eocastaneda> >> > > > > -- > Best Regards > > Lookman SANNI > http://blog.lookouster.org > MSBI Intern at Umanis Tours Services; > -- best, -oscar Oscar Castañeda http://people.apache.org/~ocastaneda
