Simon Nash wrote:
This may be true, but I think it's still useful for the user to know
whether the error stopped all further detection of errors (so there
could be other errors that weren't reported) or whether the error
was caught and allowed further error detection to continue.
Simon
Folks,
In my experience (and I've had a LOT of practice while writing the OASIS testcases!) many of the
more significant errors simply lead to a cascade of related errors which make it pretty well
impossible to work out anything after the first error, so I rate the value of further error
detection pretty low under these circumstances.
Yours, Mike.
