Opps, sorry I should have updated that before adding the module into the build.

   ...ant

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Mike Edwards
(JIRA)<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>    [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12737132#action_12737132
>  ]
>
> Mike Edwards commented on TUSCANY-3186:
> ---------------------------------------
>
> MANIFEST.MF and POM.XML problems fixed under 799319
>
>> MANIFEST.MF and POM incorrect for binding-jsonp-runtime module - Running 
>> under OSGi fails
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>                 Key: TUSCANY-3186
>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3186
>>             Project: Tuscany
>>          Issue Type: Bug
>>          Components: Java SCA JSON-RPC Binding Extension
>>    Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0
>>            Reporter: Mike Edwards
>>            Assignee: Mike Edwards
>>            Priority: Minor
>>             Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
>>
>>
>> For binding-jsonp-runtime module, there are errors to MANIFEST.MF and 
>> POM.XML:
>> 1) MANIFEST.MF
>> - Bundle-SymbolicName: org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jsonp
>> - this is incorrect - it is actually the name of another Bundle 
>> (binding.jsonp module)
>> - Import-Package is missing a whole series of package imports
>> - Export package exports a package org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.jsonp
>> - this does not exist in the bundle
>> 2) POM.XML
>> Does not have a dependency on the sca-api module for one of the testcases in 
>> the module
>> 3) This module is not part of any distribution package and as a result does 
>> not get into the PDE environment files nor does its dependencides get into 
>> the distribution/target/all/modules directory so that they cannot be found 
>> by Eclipse when doing development using PDE.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>

Reply via email to