Is the Warning/Error raised correct when SCDL interface callback config doesn't
match component type dervied from component
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: TUSCANY-3188
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3188
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0
Environment: All
Reporter: Simon Laws
Looking at ASM_8006 TestComposite61.composite (file is in General_Java)
<component name="TestComposite61Component1">
<implementation.java
class="org.oasisopen.sca.test.service9Impl"/>
<service name="Service9">
<interface.java interface="org.oasisopen.sca.test.Service9"/>
</service>
<property name="serviceName" source="$serviceName"/>
</component>
The SCDL service description only describes a forward interface but
the implementation describes a callback. We raise an error in this
case.
SEVERE: Component service interface incompatible with implementation
service interface: Component = TestComposite61Component1 Service =
Service9
Is that correct and we need to get the test fixed or should we just be
raising a warning in this case? It seems to me that if you are going
to go to the trouble of including an interface element in the SCDL
then it should match what the interface says (if this is true we need
to turn the Warning that is raised for references in this case into
Errors).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
