On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:59 PM, ant elder<[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Greg > Dritschler<[email protected]> wrote: >> I have found a problem with ordered message delivery using binding.jms in >> Tuscany 1.x. The JMS spec says >> >> "Each time a client creates a MessageProducer, it defines a new sequence of >> messages that have no ordering relationship with the messages it has >> previously sent." >> > > I'll comment further in another email but one question here - I > couldn't find that quote, which spec and version/line number is it > from? > > ...ant >
Answering my own question - thats from the JMS API v1.1 specification, setion 4.6. As an FYI the other SCA spec references related to this are: JMS binding spec CD02 rev4 line 431-435 says the JMS binding MAY support the "ordered" policy intent which is described in the SCA Policy spec 1.1 CD02 line1827 and another relevant section at 1899. As the JMS binding only says "MAY support" one easy way to deal with this is just say Tuscany doesn't. That doesn't seem such a bad thing to me as the whole idea of message order in JMS especially when trying to apply it across multiple clients and services is full of problems. ...ant
