On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Luciano Resende<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:03 AM, ant elder<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Is there a pluggable way of adding extension scheme's so that SCDL
>> validation doesn't get errors? Right now we add the non-OASIS tuscany
>> extensions explicitly to the assembly-xsd module, but thats not going
>> to be possible for others trying to write their own extensions outside
>> of Tuscany. It doesn't look like there is, am i missing it? Otherwise
>> isn't this something that needs be added?
>>
>>   ...ant
>>
>
> I have added this in 1.x in svn revision #657234 as part of
> TUSCANY-2295. I'd need to check if this was moved to 2.x
>

Ok great, in that case how about we also move the xsd's for each
extension to be included in the extension module instead of the
assembly-xsd module?

   ...ant

Reply via email to