IMO suggesting that a test passes just because it raises an exception, without being specific about what that exception might be, is at best missleading. We can't say that our code base accurately reflects the content of the SCA specifications based such a loose assertion.
Remember that the conformance tests are just that. I would expect there to be many scenarios that the otests themselves don't cover. We need extra tests in Tuscany for the cases that the otests don't cover. The least we can do is wring as much value as we can out of the set of tests that the otest suite represents. Otherwise we just have to re-write the test ourselves. Simon
