[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrew Mak updated TUSCANY-3237:
--------------------------------

    Description: In conversation with Ram, we came across some scenarios 
dealing with using collections in constructors.  In 
http://tuscany.apache.org/sca-java-implementationspring.html it is explicitly 
stated that collections are not support for bean property injection, but it 
doesn't claim the same for constructors and the behavior in Tuscany is unknown. 
 This needs to be investigated.  (was: In conversion with Ram, we came across 
some scenarios dealing with using collections in constructors.  In 
http://tuscany.apache.org/sca-java-implementationspring.html it is explicitly 
stated that collections are not support for bean property injection, but it 
doesn't claim the same for constructors and the behavior in Tuscany is unknown. 
 This needs to be investigated.)

> Use of collections for implicit SCA reference/property injection in 
> constructors
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-3237
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3237
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java SCA Spring Implementation Extension
>    Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.5
>            Reporter: Andrew Mak
>
> In conversation with Ram, we came across some scenarios dealing with using 
> collections in constructors.  In 
> http://tuscany.apache.org/sca-java-implementationspring.html it is explicitly 
> stated that collections are not support for bean property injection, but it 
> doesn't claim the same for constructors and the behavior in Tuscany is 
> unknown.  This needs to be investigated.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to