On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:24 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Simon Laws<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> I was having thinking about backward compatibility again and wonder if
> >> there is another approach we've not mentioned yet which may be easier
> >> - translate OSOA contributions to OASIS at runtime. At the simplest
> >> level all that needs to be done is change the namespace in XML files
> >> (eg in getName in the XMLStreamReader) and change the annotation
> >> package name in Java implementation classes (eg using ASM in
> >> BaseJavaImplementationImpl.setJavaClass), just those two changes would
> >> get a lot of the 1.x samples running in 2.x, and with a bit more work
> >> would be to do more complex transformations of composites to map
> >> between OSOA and OASIS. There are some things we can't support, such
> >> as conversations, but we should be able to get a lot of 1.x
> >> contributions running on the 2.x runtime with that approach.
> >>
> >> WDYT, is this something worth having a go at?
> >>
> >>   ...ant
> >>
> >
> > I think Mark discussed this approach originally under the title of a
> > migration tool. Given that we currently support OSOA and OASIS
> > composites using separate runtimes then a migration tool would be
> > useful. However I don't agree with the "at runtime" part. If we build
> > a migration tool I think it should be under the control of the user as
> > to when it runs. If they have a 1.0 composite then they can convert it
> > to a 1.1 composite, take notice of any errors that are reported during
> > the conversion and, once happy, run it on the 1.1 runtime. No magic
> > required.
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
> Ok if we have a tool approach then it will be easy enough to have it
> work ine either batch or runtime and share the code.
>
> I guess an obvious way to start would be trying to use XSLT to
> transform OSOA composites and contribution xml into OASIS ones and
> seeing what things that comes across which can't be migrated with a
> simple transform.
>
>   ...ant
>

Using an XSLT transformation looks like good migration tool
for me. But that's only good enough for the composite file transformation,
we need a method to handle the annotations used in the code?

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam

Reply via email to