On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:49 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> b3/ one or more composite files but which are present in >> META-INF/sca-deployables (is this still supported?) >> > > No, i think i took out support for that earlier on in 2.x when porting > from 1.x, there may be a ML thread. Something like that still seems > like a good idea to me though to make it seem easy to create a simple > contribution. I'd quite like the spec people to extend the application > composite concept in the JEE spec to the Assembly spec so you can have > something like application composite with a standard name in a regular > contribution like you can have a web.composite in a .war contribution. > I guess we could add support for that to Tuscany and see what the spec > people think of it? >
Any comments on that? Would anyone mind if the standalone runtime supported using a single composite named "application.composite" in a contribution as well as the meta-inf/sca-contribution.xml approach? ...ant
