On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:05 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Next, >>> I'll look into upgrading to the latest JSON-RPC Jabsorb framework. >>> >> >> How about updating to Jackson instead of Jabsorb? We already use >> Jackson in the JSONP binding in 2.x, it seems much more up to date and >> designed for what we need in Tuscany. >> >> ...ant >> > > I had a quick look at jackson, does that have support for JSON-RPC or > just JSON ? > >
Right, it handles just the JSON part, we'd have to layer the rest of the protocol on top of that. Not such a big deal though and a similar thing as we already do in the binding for the SMD support. ...ant
