[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764427#action_12764427
 ] 

Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-3299:
-------------------------------------

This looks similar to the problem in samples/feed-aggregator that I mentioned 
on the dev list a few weeks ago in [1].

[1] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tuscany-dev/200909.mbox/%[email protected]%3e


> ATOM binding testcase failure 
> ProviderFeedEntityTagsTestCase.testUnmodifiedGetIfUnModified
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-3299
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3299
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: ant elder
>             Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
>
>
> Error Message
> expected:<304> but was:<200>
> Stacktrace
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<304> but was:<200>
>       at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>       at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:277)
>       at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64)
>       at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:195)
>       at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:201)
>       at 
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.atom.ProviderFeedEntityTagsTestCase.testUnmodifiedGetIfUnModified(ProviderFeedEntityTagsTestCase.java:192)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:127)
>       at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:177)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:345)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1009)
> For now I'll remove the test with an @Ignore referencing this jira

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to