This is my version...

  testDummy(client.ASM_4002_TestCase) - regression
  testDummy(client.ASM_4003_TestCase) - regression
  testDummy(client.ASM_4004_TestCase) - regression
  testDummy(client.ASM_5023_TestCase) - OASIS issue TUSCANY-3328
  testDummy(client.ASM_5033_TestCase) - regression
  testDummy(client.ASM_6001_TestCase) - regression
  testDummy(client.ASM_6016_TestCase) - policy TUSCANY-3331
  testDummy(client.ASM_6031_TestCase) - policy TUSCANY-3331
  testDummy(client.ASM_6032_TestCase) - policy TUSCANY-3331
  testDummy(client.ASM_6033_TestCase) - multiplicity validation TUSCANY-3333
  testDummy(client.ASM_8001_TestCase) - OASIS issue TUSCANY-3334
  testDummy(client.ASM_8010_TestCase) - regression
  testDummy(client.ASM_8011_TestCase) - OASIS issue TUSCANY-3336
  testDummy(client.ASM_8017_TestCase) - callback matching TUSCANY-3337
  testDummy(client.ASM_9999_TestCase) - ???
  testDummy(client.ASM_10001_TestCase) - regression
  testDummy(client.ASM_10003_TestCase) - regression
  testDummy(client.ASM_12003_TestCase) - schemaLocation error
reporting TUSCANY-3339
  testDummy(client.ASM_12004_TestCase) - OASIS issue TUSCANY-3340
  testDummy(client.ASM_12005_TestCase) - OASIS issue TUSCANY-3190
  testDummy(client.ASM_12007_TestCase) - import location matching TUSCANY-3326
  testDummy(client.ASM_12008_TestCase) - import processing TUSCANY-3341
  testDummy(client.ASM_12011_TestCase) - import processing TUSCANY-3341
  testDummy(client.ASM_12012_TestCase) - regression
  testDummy(client.ASM_13004_TestCase) - regression

This is a bit odd given the number that fail now that worked a couple
of days back (seems to be something to do with adjustments to imports
in the tests I've had to make - looking now). Also there are some that
I know fail in eclipse for OASIS reasons at that did not appear in the
list from the maven run. Not sure what's up.

I agree that the policy ones are high on the list. Also the 120xx
failures are down to out import processing which needs close
examination.

I'm post back when I know what's going on with the regressions.

Simon

Reply via email to