...snip > > ComponentReference: The component-level reference configuration > Reference: The componentType-level reference definition > Binding: The binding configuration >
If we have to add extra text here to clarify what each of the methods returns why don't we add that text (or something contraction of it) to the method name itself? I don't think that less is more in this case. I don't think matching the assembly model interface is necessarily an advantage as I don't find component.getService().getService() particularly clear either. I can live with... getComponentReferenceInterfaceContract() getBindingInterfaceContract() Can we have the following though. getComponentTypeReferenceInterfaceContract() or even getImplementationReferenceInterfaceContract() or similar Regards Simon
