On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:01 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I fixed the issue under http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=887470&view=rev. >>> >> >> Thanks that does help get passed this particular problem. >> >>> I also have some local changes that enable the build.xml to run two nodes >>> with different JVMs over tribes based multicast. Do you know if the build >>> machine supports multicast? If so, I can commit the changes. >>> >> >> I'd guess that multicast will work within the one build machine, but >> if it didn't the static routes support we have does work enough to >> support this as there's just two nodes. However, the test isn't really >> good enough at verifying things work yet - if something breaks the >> test will still pass successfully - so there's not a whole lot of >> point having it part of the build until we fix that. I've already >> started looking at adding some better tests as part of all this domain >> work. >> >> Incidentally i'm finding quite a lot of other issues as i use this to >> do with things like the classloaders using by tribes or sca bindings, >> inconsistencies in the endpoint URIs used by all the different pieces, >> particular runtime requirements caused by the way endpoints get >> serialized etc. I'll try to post more on those in separate emails. >> >> ...ant >> > > Where we are with this issue ? Does this happen just when deployed in > the tomcat/tuscany.war environment or is there a way to reproduce this > using some itest (e.g. itest-nodes-two-nodes-two-vms-test) ? If you > guys still have the issue and want some help, I could take a look at > this. >
No its not just the tomcat/tuscany.war environment, but there aren't very good or many tests around this area yet, helping write some would be a great place to start :) ...ant
