On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I made a change [1] based on my understanding of thread [2]. For tribes > static members to work, the receiver port has to match the port in the > static member. To make it simple, the fix use the receiver port from the > GroupChannel as the port for the static members so that we don't have to > configure the tribes endpoint registry on each machine with a different > receiver port. > > Please give a try to see if it works. I'm don't know which test case to use. > > [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=889045&view=rev > [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg24873.html > > Thanks, > --- > Raymond Feng > Apache Tuscany PMC Member: http://tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of Tuscany In Action (A book on Tuscany SCA): > http://tuscanyinaction.com/ > > >
That is using the port of the local receiver but isn't it that the static route port has to match the receiver port _of the remote receiver_? We dont have any very good tests yet as the function isnt finished and doesnt work, you can try the MultiRegTestCase to play with it which starts up three registries connected with static routes and multicast disabled, though for now thats more a simple test harness than an automated test so you'd need to customize it for your machine. ...ant
