[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793164#action_12793164
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2882:
------------------------------------
As far as I can see the SCA Spring spec doesnt say how imports should work so
it seems reasonable to have them work the same as native spring does them. If
you're saying thats not the case and Tuscany uses absolute paths them that
sounds like a bug to me (unless theres something in the spec ive missed). Would
you be able to attach a testcase demonstrating the issue to this JIRA? It would
be good to make sure the OASIS spec is clear about how this should work.
> Relative path imports don't work in Spring implementations.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-2882
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2882
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA Spring Implementation Extension
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.5
> Reporter: Phil Housley
>
> Using implementation.spring, the Tuscany bean file parser and Spring's parser
> interpret import links in different ways. Spring sees them as relative,
> tuscany as absolute, so one parser will generally fail unless everything goes
> into a root folder.
> I have a patch for this, using Spring's relative resource system, but I
> cannot guarantee that the two parsers now use the same mechanisms. I'll
> attach when I've cleaned it up.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
