> > Supporting both approaches provides all the flexibility we need and > seems like it should make everyone happy.
Yep, if we want to have a short, abstract URI that de-references a config file for physical configuration then great. Would be appropriate for the more complex configurations that have been mentioned. If we want to extend the abstract URI with physcial configuration then that would be great too. The runtime doesn't need to go look up the info that is provided in the URI. Seems straightforward. Simon
