On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > [[SNIP]] > >> It sounds like we don't really need multiple registries concurrently >> in the same runtime but whats really wanted is a way to have >> separately configurable Tuscany runtime instances from the same set of >> Tuscany jars. That would be really useful, it would simplify a a lot >> of our code, it would fix other cases where this has been an issue >> like the ServletHost problems mentioned above, and it would help with >> some other things i've never been able to find easy ways to do with >> the current configuration options. So - > > NO! Why do we have to clone Tuscany runtime instances in the same JVM for > the mere purpose of supporting multiple domains? Please remember that all > the code in the extension point registry is stateless and independent of > the application state (domain/node/contribution/composite). >
Thats a strawman argument Raymond so I'm not going to get drawn into it. ...ant
