+1 on Simon's points. We should not "mix" the view of sharing endpoint
descriptions (at runtime) dynamically against how all resources in the
domain are managed to provide flexible deployment options.
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Simon Laws" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 2:49 AM
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Imports and exports in the distributed domain
The thing about our slightly more dynamic approach to managing
endpoints across the domain that we have now is that we are not
precluding any particular approach to managing the domain in general.
The domain manager in 1.x is still as relevant now IMHO as a means of
managing the contributions in the domain and making them available to
the nodes that need them. The way that I look at it is that the set of
contributions can either be added to the manager and provided to the
nodes or added to the nodes and provided to the (notional) manager.
It all comes down the where we manage the model of the contributions
and the relationship between them.
Simon
