I understand that _was_ the idea but now that we've changed how the local sca binding works there is nothing that is actually using this anymore is there?
...ant On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > The idea was to allow interceptors (or invokers) in the invocation chain to > tell Tuscany runtime if passByReference is allowed. For example, the Java > Invoker will return true if the target operation in the implementation class > has @AllowsPassByReference. If one of the interceptors will copy data (for > example, as part of data transformation), then there is no need for Invoker > to do it again. > > Thanks, > Raymond > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "ant elder" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:34 PM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Do we need the DataExchangeSemantics interface anymore? > >> Do we need the DataExchangeSemantics interface still after all the >> binding sca and pass by value copy fixes? AFAICT nothing needs it now >> and we have no tests or usecases or anything using it so is there any >> reason to keep it? >> >> ...ant > >
