On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:15 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I don't have any insight yet but running the otest/newlayout version >>> of the tests against the latest code does see the 900X tests passing. >>> I know that's not hugely helpful but at least we just need to unpick >>> what is missing from the "compliance-tests" configuration. >>> >>> Simon >>> >> >> I had to make changes on the Tuscany Runtime Bridge in order to >> properly identify runtime/execution errors. Do you need to publish new >> artifacts from the otest/newLayout ? >> > > Oh right ok i remember i did see those changes, i'll go try merging > that to the trunk code too. > > ...ant >
Thanks... I didn't realize we had duplicated pieces of the code in trunk, and though it was more about publishing binaries from otest. I'm in the middle of lots of schema related changes, so your help merging is appreciated. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
