Thanks, that did fix it, but not until I'd built twice which was a bit
confusing and i guess why my attempts at fixing it didn't seem to be
working. Looking at whats going on the node-launcher-equinox and the
test that uses it is they don't use the dependcies from the mvn build
but try to find a tuscany distribution and use that so end up finding
the one in the distribution/all/target folder which isn't going to be
up to date. I've now moved the tests out of the node-launcher-equinox
module to an itest.

   ...ant

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote:
> It should be fixed now:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=926638&view=rev
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=926641&view=rev
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "ant elder" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 12:33 AM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Build problems in OSGi modules
>
>> I've been getting build fails in the OSGi modules and samples which i
>> thought must be due to local changes but i'm still getting them now
>> after a clean checkout, and looking in the Hudson logs similar things
>> are happening there though its not failing the build there for some
>> reason. The fails are things like:
>>
>> Mar 23, 2010 12:19:34 AM
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.DefaultModuleActivatorExtensionPoint start
>> SEVERE: org/apache/geronimo/transaction/manager/XidFactory
>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>> org/apache/geronimo/transaction/manager/XidFactory
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.transaction.runtime.geronimo.TransactionModuleActivator.start(TransactionModuleActivator.java:56)
>>
>> and
>>
>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>> org/apache/tuscany/sca/common/xml/stax/StAXHelper
>>       at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.sca.provider.DefaultSCABindingMapper.createDelegatingBinding(DefaultSCABindingMapper.java:209)
>>       at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.sca.provider.DefaultSCABindingMapper.<init>(DefaultSCABindingMapper.java:101)
>>       ... 61 more
>>
>> Anyone else seeing these or can see whats wrong?
>>
>>  ...ant
>
>

Reply via email to