On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: antelder > Date: Thu Apr 15 07:39:47 2010 > New Revision: 934318 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934318&view=rev > Log: > Add TODO comment about problem in ServiceDiscovery > > Modified: > > tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/extensibility/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/extensibility/ServiceDiscovery.java > > Modified: > tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/extensibility/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/extensibility/ServiceDiscovery.java > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/extensibility/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/extensibility/ServiceDiscovery.java?rev=934318&r1=934317&r2=934318&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- > tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/extensibility/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/extensibility/ServiceDiscovery.java > (original) > +++ > tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/extensibility/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/extensibility/ServiceDiscovery.java > Thu Apr 15 07:39:47 2010 > @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ import org.apache.tuscany.sca.extensibil > * Services are described using configuration files in META-INF/services. > * Service description specifies a class name followed by optional properties. > * > + * TODO: this is broken as it uses a static INSTANCE but non-static > serviceAttributes > + * and discoverer so the same INSTANCE gets used across NodeFactories and > picks up > + * old values > * > * @version $Rev$ $Date$ > */ > > >
Hi Ant What was the particular problem you're seeing? I assume that for a given JVM the set of extensions present would be the same but you're saying this is causing problems? Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
