I'll assume silence means no one objects to this approach and I'll look at doing this refactor at some point.
...ant On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:39 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok then how about having a separate build module for creating the PDE > target so its not bound to the features or distributions. That way it > can have everything it needs and it wont require everything in the > distributions or have any impact on what we have in the features and > distribution. > > ...ant > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:05 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'm still not sure I understand this - is the issue that when provided >>> scope is used then the dependencies don't get added to the generated >>> PDE target properly so there are errors when using the module in the >>> Eclipse PDE environment? >>> >>> ...ant >> >> Yes, exactly... One would have rex x saying there is no bundle >> exporting the package (I don't recall exact message). >> >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> >
