On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:49 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:17 PM, kelvin goodson <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> I think I only see these errors when I am at home, and I haven't got a
>>> note of the errors here. I had assumed that others were still seeing
>>> them (maybe if I try the build again when I get home it won't happen).
>>>  I had got into the habit of running mvn -fae.
>>>
>>> Kelvin.
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:57 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:43 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Author: kelvingoodson
>>>>> Date: Thu May 27 12:43:27 2010
>>>>> New Revision: 948807
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=948807&view=rev
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> mention possibility of hazelcast related errors in the build
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>    tuscany/sca-java-2.x/branches/sca-java-2.0-M5/RELEASE_NOTES
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: tuscany/sca-java-2.x/branches/sca-java-2.0-M5/RELEASE_NOTES
>>>>> URL: 
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/branches/sca-java-2.0-M5/RELEASE_NOTES?rev=948807&r1=948806&r2=948807&view=diff
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- tuscany/sca-java-2.x/branches/sca-java-2.0-M5/RELEASE_NOTES (original)
>>>>> +++ tuscany/sca-java-2.x/branches/sca-java-2.0-M5/RELEASE_NOTES Thu May 
>>>>> 27 12:43:27 2010
>>>>> @@ -37,6 +37,17 @@ Overview
>>>>>
>>>>>  See the CHANGES file for a detailed list of the features in this release.
>>>>>
>>>>> +Known Issues
>>>>> +------------
>>>>> +
>>>>> +If when building using the source distribution of tuscany you see build 
>>>>> errors
>>>>> +relating to use of hazelcast, this is a known issue which occurs in some
>>>>> +environments where our use of hazelcast doesn't match up with your 
>>>>> network
>>>>> +configuration. If you see these errors please contact us on the mailing 
>>>>> list
>>>>> +as described below. You may wish to build using the
>>>>> +"mvn -fae"
>>>>> +command, so that the rest of the build completes before it reports the 
>>>>> issue.
>>>>> +
>>>>>  Support
>>>>>  -------
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could we just try to fix this instead? I didn't know anyone was still
>>>> seeing errors, whats the problem, which tests are having errors?
>>>>
>>>>   ...ant
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> I get it when I'm using a VPN so it's down to the way we handle
>> optional NICs. Possibly just an arbitrary order thing, i.e. which one
>> Hazelcast chooses to use. .When I drop of the VPN it then works. I
>> haven't got to looking any further so far. If it's going to be tricky
>> to fix I think we should note that it's a know problem.
>>
>> There is a work around that I think Ant previously suggested of
>> setting the bind property to "*" but it doesn't work consistently for
>> me.
>>
>
> Can you do a full build and get a list of all the fails? They should
> all work if all the failing tests are updated to use the 127.0.0.1
> loopback address which should avoid the issue.
>
>   ...ant
>

I'm doing a build now to see if I get the conformance issue that
Kelvin experienced. I didn't start the VPN though so i'll rinse and
repeat when the first one's done.

S.

-- 
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com

Reply via email to